Book Summary: What climate fiction should accomplish

Last week, I woke up in Washington, DC, to a rolling fog, and suffocation. The temperature reached triple digits, and so did the air quality index, which my phone told me meant “very bad.” If I lived somewhere else—in Delhi, perhaps, or Kinshasa, or Los Angeles—where high temperatures and cool skies were more common, I might not be so surprised. But climate change means that such conditions are no longer confined to specific areas of the world, and people everywhere are beginning to contend with frequent occurrences becoming the norm. “To be ignorant of these results is to be an outsider, not normal,” Robert Rubsam wrote about climate change and natural disasters this week Atlantic. So why is it so difficult to point out literary stories that succeed in conveying the extraordinary feeling of waking up in a different world?

Author Amitav Ghosh, in his 2016 book, The Great Deceptionhe claimed that this was because the literary novel was created for a quiet planet. Now that the Earth is warming, he suggests that we need new forms of storytelling that can capture what it feels like to live in an unpredictable world. His new novel, Ghost-Eyeattempts to do so. Unfortunately, Rubsam says, it fails in its work. But when I read the comments on his article, I saw readers arguing that too much text does addressing global warming, and commenting that the genre known as “climate fiction” did not get its due.

You’re right – many genre stories deal with apocalyptic weather disturbances. Climate concerns also seep into literary fiction, as Rubsam points out. He does not agree with Ghosh’s contention that writers cannot keep up with strange times. But he also encourages a broader way of thinking, pointing to early stories that successfully show how to live through disruption: Juan Rulfo’s response to 1950s Mexico, Pedro Paramo; José Donoso’s magical-realistic novel of Chilean chaos, Dirty Night Bird. Using novels from other eras, Rubsam moves beyond the idea of ​​simply showing specific signs of global warming, such as shrinking ice caps or dried up aquifers. He writes about books that evoke the feeling that the world has moved beneath your feet.

This discussion of how fiction deals with “powers so vast and impersonal that they seem to confound attempts at storytelling,” as Rubsam put it, reminded me of another book article. published in Atlantic this week, by Hillary Kelly. Kelly also believes that a new novel—in this case Jem Calder’s I want you to be happy-fails to make the strangeness of modern life compelling. But what angers him most is that Calder’s portrayal of Millennials and apathy takes those qualities at face value and, in doing so, imitates them. “I want to understand alienation; I don’t want to feel alienated – and nothing more – by reading,” Kelly writes. Similarly, I don’t need fiction to explain how dangerous a flash flood is, or how dangerous a tornado is in your town. I have experienced those things myself, and they will certainly repeat themselves in my life. I want my fiction to be bolder: to use language and ideas that bring me to a new kind of understanding, not just a reconstruction of what I already know.

---

A Crisis That Novelists Can’t Handle

By Robert Rubsam

Amitav Ghosh believes that climate change calls for a rethinking of the novel. His new work of fiction fails that standard.

Read the full article.

---

What to Read

You and meand Nicholson Baker

I can now say that I have been reading Baker for over 20 years, or more than half of my life. But I didn’t know that would happen when I got it You and me in a college friend’s car, borrowed it, and never returned it. The subject, not the author, interested me then—I loved John Updike. And so does Baker, though love maybe not the right word. This book-length essay is not entirely, or not only, a tribute to Updike; is a hilarious confessional “true story” of Baker’s anxieties, ambitions, competitive jealousies, and feelings of inadequacy in the face of much of Updike’s work. It is also rich, with wonderful observations on literacy in general, as in a passage that considers how memory is most affected once the writer dies: “The living are ‘people’ who write about their own lives; the dead write about irretrievability. lifewow wow wow.” – Elisa Gabbert

From our list: Five books for book lovers

---

It will be out next week

📚 I Made You Inside My Headand Marta Pérez-Carbonell

---

Your weekend Read

Extreme Fear of Sex

By Faith Hill

Perhaps “gender stagnation,” then, is just a symptom of something bigger: a lack of emotion, born of deep discomfort and uncertainty. If so, the stakes would be much higher than they were in 2006. It would mean that people are not only coming out of lust with their partners but are struggling to connect, feel deeply, and exist in their own lives. “Today, the question is not so much How can you maintain interest for a long time?,” Perel told me, “but How do we turn them on in the first place?“

Read the full article.

---