The man who contributed PhilHealth for 25 years He died seven hours after arriving at the hospital. His family’s tragedy should force the Philippines to ask a difficult question: Have we built the right model of universal health care?
Just 2,000 kilometers away, Thailand made a different promise to its citizens more than two decades ago. A patient arriving at the hospital with a national identity card. Treatment begins. The government pays.
Consider the following analogy: Two men experience the same medical emergency. Sudden bleeding of the brain. Both are rushed to the emergency room. Both need urgent surgery. Both families are very scared. But the next few hours unfold very differently.
In Thailand, the family asks: “How often can doctors start?”
In the Philippines, the family may ask: “How much will this cost? How much will PhilHealth cost? How can we raise the money?”
That difference represents the biggest challenge of Philippine healthcare today.
The Philippines has achieved what many countries aspire to: universal health insurance on paper. Almost every Filipino is enrolled in PhilHealth. But a card in your wallet is not the same as financial protection.
The health system should not be judged by how many people carry an insurance card. It should be judged by the simplest question: When a citizen faces the worst medical crisis of his life, does the system stand by them?
For too many Filipino families, the answer is still uncertain.
ALSO ON RAPPLER
The numbers tell a sad story
Thailand and the Philippines are not worlds apart. They are all middle-income countries in Southeast Asia. They all have limited resources. Neither have the wealth of Japan, Singapore, or the United States. Yet their health outcomes are very different.
Thailand spends about $29 billion annually on health care for about 72 million people. The Philippines spends about $26 billion for about 117 million people.
The difference is not just how much money is spent. The difference is who pays.
In Thailand, the government finances about 75% of total health spending. Households only pay about 10-12% directly out of pocket.
In the Philippines, government spending accounts for only about one-third of health spending. PhilHealth contributes the rest. Filipino families still pay about 45% of health care costs directly out of their own pockets.
This means that when an illness occurs, a Filipino family is more likely to experience financial ruin. Medical expenses are not just health problems. It is one of the fastest ways a family can fall into poverty.
30-baht revolution
More than two decades ago, Thailand made a political decision that changed its health system. In 2001, the government introduced what became known as the 30-baht health plan. Its philosophy was revolutionary in its simplicity: “You are Thai. You are sick. You deserve treatment.”
The system was not built with the concept that citizens must first prove how much they contributed. It was built on the belief that health care is a public service funded by the nation as a whole. The government allocates money from general taxes to the National Health Security Office, which pays hospitals and health care providers.
For ordinary citizens, the process is simple. The patient presents his national ID. The system verifies their eligibility. Treatment begins. Families do not need to calculate package rates, understand types of insurance, or discuss how much money they must prepare before a life-saving procedure.
Thailand’s system is not perfect. It faces challenges that include rising costs, an aging population, and a shortage of health workers. But it did something amazing: it significantly reduced the financial fear associated with getting sick.
Philippine insurance crisis
The Philippines chose a different path. PhilHealth was created based on the social health insurance model. Such a model usually creates administrative questions: Is the patient eligible? What is the benefits package? How much does PhilHealth pay? What charges are left? What documents should be submitted? These are the right questions for the insurance company.
But the family standing outside the operating room does not receive health care as a claims process. They see it as a problem.
The latest the death of a longtime PhilHealth contributor it became a national crisis because it revealed a painful confusion. A person can spend decades paying into the system, but their family can still face great uncertainty during a medical emergency.
Unfair budget question
Whenever the Philippines discusses health care financing, the immediate response is often: “Where is the money going to come from?”
But perhaps the most important question is: “What are our national priorities?”
Every year, the government spends hundreds of billions of pesos on different types of social assistance and subsidies. The sad thing is that this money often comes after families have already experienced fear, uncertainty, and financial hardship.
The better question is not just whether the government should spend more on health care. It is as if the same public money should be organized in a different way: from an active system of asking for help, to an active system where health care is guaranteed from the moment the patient enters the hospital.
The country should ask whether a large portion of public resources should be directed to a system that prevents families from falling into poverty in the first place.
A fatal disease can wipe out a lifetime of savings within days. A country that spends billions of money to help citizens after they become poor should also ask if it has invested enough to prevent them from becoming poor because of health costs.
Health care should not be a political preference. It should be a social bond.
In Thailand, the patient arrives at the hospital and presents a national ID card. In the Philippines, a patient may spend days or weeks going from office to office, collecting letters of guarantee to cover the hospital bill. The difference is not just administrative. It reflects two different social contracts.
Does the Philippines need to rethink PhilHealth?
The country should ask a fundamental question: Should PhilHealth continue to operate as an insurance institution, or should it consider transforming into a tax-funded national health care buyer similar to Thailand’s model?
The debate should no longer be about increasing benefit packages or adjusting reimbursement rates. The Philippines needs to discuss the architecture of the whole system.
The goal should be clear: No Filipino family standing outside an emergency room should ask, “Can we afford to save our loved one?”
A true measure of universal health care
Universal health care is not measured by the number of people with a membership card. It is measured by what happens at 2 a.m. when dad has a stroke, baby can’t breathe, or mom needs emergency surgery. In that moment, the government shows what its social contract means.
Thailand held its elections more than 20 years ago. The Philippines must now decide if it is ready to develop its own.
The question is not whether the Philippines can afford a Thai-style health care system. The question is whether it can afford another generation of Filipinos to go bankrupt because they got sick. – Rappler.com
Dr. Jaemin Park is a physician and healthcare investor who works at the intersection of healthcare policy, innovation and investment in Asia. He works as an adjunct professor at the UP Manila College of Public Health. He writes frequently on health systems and policy reform in Southeast Asia.
