This is a version of The Atlantic Every day, a magazine that guides you through the top stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Register here.
Earlier this year, Nicki Minaj asked her fans to “go out there and make babies.” Onstage at the DC venue, the rapper and recently renamed MAGA wasn’t just talking about the wonders of parenthood—she was plugging President Trump’s new baby-saving account.
530A accounts, better known by their other official name, Trump Accounts, are set to launch on July 4. Like existing savings accounts, these are tax-advantaged investment vehicles. During tax season, any parent of children up to age 18 can open a Trump Account on behalf of their child, regardless of their income level; if the child was born in the years 2025 to 2028, they can also receive $1,000 in their account automatically, directly from the federal government. The money can only be invested in US companies, and parents are the managers of the account until their child turns 18. According to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, more than 5 million children have already been enrolled in the program this year.
Trump’s accounts have attracted wealthy donors from the private sector, who have agreed to top up the accounts by giving extra money to qualifying children. Tech billionaires Michael and Susan Dell are contributing $6.25 billion to the program, which will put $250 on account of certain children across the country who are too old to get $1,000. Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, is donating $75 million to a similar program in Connecticut, which could go to children who do it qualifying for $1,000, and Altimeter Capital CEO Brad Gerstner has said he plans to do something comparable in Indiana. (Minaj also pledged to donate up to $300,000 only for his fans(but he doesn’t explain how that might work.) No matter how much your child deserves, you can add an extra $5,000 of your own money to the pot each year. It’s all meant to be appreciated as America’s economy does, to ski into something that can give kids a head start when they grow up.
From a financial planning perspective, taking free money from the government is a no-brainer. And the policy has the ability to two-way appeal-although, as Michael Sherraden, a professor of social development at Washington University in St. Louis, he told me, the idea of giving kids some seed money has become “more of a Democratic idea than a Republican idea” in recent years. As a result, Trump’s accounts may be “on better footing than most other policy debates” in terms of their ability to defeat the current administration, he said.
But the way the account is set up can limit its success. One challenge is that not every child who is eligible for a Trump Account will get one, because parents have to opt-in on their tax returns. Research has shown that it’s harder to get people to opt-in than to opt-out: When Maine launched a similar opt-in program for children born in the state, less than half of parents who registered after five years. Once the program is changed to option-outparticipation increased to 100 percent. Families who don’t pay taxes—usually those with the lowest incomes—will not have a chance to check the box. And because eligibility for private donor money is determined by zip code, according to Treasury Department rules, low-income children in high-income areas may miss out, if Time details.
The Trump accounts build on decades of existing child savings account policies (see: UGMA, UTMA, 529 accounts and “child bond” programs), which means parents have many additional options for their children. Unlike Trump Accounts it is a MAGA package (you will need to fill out a “Form 4547” to register), and a specific investment strategy. As research from Vanguard details, this money is parked in US companies only, meaning that it is drawn on the ebb and flow of a single country’s economy. If some kind of black-swan event takes hold of those reserves, these accounts could be at risk; some children’s savings account policies give parents the option to invest in US and international stocks. Donors can also end up creating a portfolio: Depending on New York TimesUS officials are considering allowing wealthy donors to load these accounts with shares in their companies, which could exacerbate the problem of portfolio diversification (investments in individual stocks are typically riskier than broad index funds).
The program also happens to coincide with one of the president’s puppet dramas. Despite being, essentially, an establishment figure – a real estate billionaire in the ranks of Manhattan’s richest and most powerful – Trump came to power in 2016 by selling out Americans. faux-popular economic platform. The broad coalition of voters that fueled both of his elections included sections of the working class and some of his good friends. Few of Trump’s policies while in office can be called populist (the laws he pushes tend to benefit the wealthy), but he has frequently made changes to his staff, including “a great, beautiful bill” and his executive orders.
Trump has always claimed to help American families; he once called himself, somewhat confusingly, “the fertilizer president.” Trump’s accounts theoretically represent the kind of pro-child policy that both parties can rally around, but the brand could be a liability. At a time when most of the country refuses—or he is actively insulting-President, his name alone may end up limiting the success of the program.
Related:
Here are four new stories from Atlantic:
Today’s news
- Democratic National Committee released a report examining the party’s losses in the 2024 election after months of internal pressure, despite initial efforts to keep it private. The report’s author argues that Democrats lost the trust of voters and failed to emphasize strength and unity, with DNC Chairman Ken Martin admitting that he mishandled the process and apologized for trying to suppress the document.
- Fine Arts Commission approved President Trump’s proposal to build a 250-foot triumphal arch in Washington, DC, despite objections to decorative elements including golden eagles and a winged angel at the top of the structure.
- Trump announced plans to reduce restrictions on hydrofluorocarbonspowerful greenhouse gases used in air conditioners and refrigerators, undermining bipartisan efforts to end “high-level pollutants.”
Dispatches
Explore all of our newsletters here.
Evening Read
Trump Misses The Entire Point Of Arches
Written by Tyler Green
Since almost the beginning of the United States, Americans have used arches to make visual arguments about the nation’s values.
When George Washington arrived in Philadelphia after being elected president in 1789, he was greeted by a row of laurels and evergreens. Among its creators was painter Charles Willson Peale, who also created a 46-foot arch of painted canvas and wood that briefly stood in front of the city’s Presidential Palace, where Washington would live for most of his two terms. Arches, the form that connected the new nation of North America to the classical Europe that had informed the republican system of the Founding Fathers, helped give the United States a legitimizing history.
Since then, artists have used arches to celebrate American socialism, including warning us about democratic and totalitarian forces that can corrupt them. In other words, they have issued warnings against the very features that the latest proposed arch—which President Trump wants to build across the Potomac River from Washington, DC—will include.
More From Atlantic
Cultural Breakdown
Investigate. Subsidy the newspaper’s response to accusations of publishing false points generated by AI for a new phase in the strive to keep human literatureVauhini Vara writes.
Fix it (or don’t). For others, typos are no longer a sign of laziness evidence of human contactMichael Waters writes.
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this magazine.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for your support Atlantic.
